GEN 1.7  DIFFERENCES FROM ICAO STANDARDS, RECOMMENDED PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

The air traffic rules and procedures applicable to air traffic within the territory of Hungary conform with Annexes to the Convention on International Civil Aviation and to those portions, applicable to aircraft, of the Procedures for Air Navigation Services - Air Traffic Management (Doc 4444 ATM/501) and the Regional Supplementary Procedures (Doc 7030) applicable to the EUR Region with the differences (printed in Bold) and additional provisions listed hereunder:

Provision affectedDifference in full text
Annex 1 - Personnel Licensing
(11th edition)
NIL
Chapter 11.2.2.1The licences issued by a Member State of the European Union are recognised as valid by all the other Member States without administrative issuance of an additional authorisation.
1.2.4.1The term:' medical certificate' is used in lieu of:' medical assessment
1.2.4.2States shall apply, as part of their State safety programme, basic safety management principles to the medical assessment process of licence holders, that as a minimum include
1.2.4.11.2Not specifically mentioned
1.2.8.2FCL.115 LAPL, of FCL.210 PPL, FCL.315 CPL, and FCL.315(A), FCL.410.A MPL, FCL.515 ATPL, FCL930 FI, FCL.930FI FI, FCL.930.TRI TRI, FCL.930.CRI CRI, FCL930.IRI IRI, FCL930.SFI SFI, FCL930.MCCI MCCI, FCL930.ST STI, FCL.930.MI MI, FCL.930FTI FTI, Appendix 3 to Annex I, Appendix 5 to Annex I, and Appendix 6 to Annex I of Annex I (Part-FCL) of Commission Regulation (EU) 2011/1178 Flight Crew Licensing, ensure the necessary flexibility of training programmes.
1.2.8.4The competency based training concept is not implemented.
1.2.9.2No such a specific requirement.
1.2.9.3Level 4 language proficiency endorsement is required as defined in Regulation No 1178/2011/EU.
1.2.9.6Pilots who have demonstrated language proficiency at operational level are re evaluated every 4 years
Chapter 22.1.10.Pilots aged 60 64 may act as pilots in command in the single pilots international CAT operations of aircraft other than aeroplanes and helicopters.
2.3.2.1Part FCL differs here from ICAO in that sense that the holder of a PPL to provide flight instruction may receive remunerations.
2.3.3.1.1Applicants for a PPL(A) shall have completed at least 45 hours of flight instruction in aeroplanes, 5 of which may have been completed in an FSTD.
2.3.4.1.1Applicants for a PPL(H) shall have completed at least 45 hours of flight instruction on helicopters, 5 of which may have been completed in an FNPT or FFS.
2.3.4.2.1The total dual flight instruction in ICAO is 20 hours and in Part FCL 25 hours. See general difference in 2.3.4.1.1
2.3.5.1.1It is required to have a CPL(A) or (H) Part FCL license, and due to which of these 2 a pilot has requirements are listed in provision FCL.720.PL
2.3.5.1.2It is required to have a CPL(A) or (H) Part FCL license, and due to which of these 2 a pilot has requirements are listed in provision FCL.720.PL
2.3.5.1.3It is required to have a CPL(A) or (H) Part FCL license, and due to which of these 2 a pilot has requirements are listed in provision FCL.720.PL
2.3.5.2It is required to have a CPL(A) or (H) Part FCL license, and due to which of these 2 a pilot has requirements are listed in provision FCL.720.PL
2.3.6.1The total flight time in ICAO is 25 hours and in Part FCL 35 hours.
2.4.3.1.1FCL.315 CPL together with Appendix 3 to Annex I (Part-FCL) of Reg. 1178/2011 allows a maximum of 10 hours credit.
2.4.4.1.1The total flight time in ICAO is 150 hours and in Part FCL 185 hours
2.4.4.1.1.1The total flight time in ICAO is 150 hours and in Part FCL 185 hours.
2.4.5.1.1It is required to have a CPL(A) or (H) Part FCL license, and due to which of these 2 a pilot has requirements are listed in provision FCL.720.PL
2.4.5.1.2It is required to have a CPL(A) or (H) Part FCL license, and due to which of these 2 a pilot has requirements are listed in provision FCL.720.PL
2.4.6.1.1.1Division of hours in different, like in Part FCL it is 5 hours cross country flight time and 5 hours of night flight
2.5.1.2.1.1As well as the additional requirements underpinning the approved adapted competency model
2.6.3.1.1.1Part FCL requires in addition 500 hours in multi pilot operations on aeroplanes.
2.6.4.1.1.1Part FCL requires in addition 350 hours in multi pilot helicopters.
2.9.1.3.1The total flight time in ICAO is 6 hours and in Part FCL 15 hours. Also the amount of launches differs. ICAO requires 20 launches and Part FCL 40 launches.
2.10.1.3.3In case of remuneration ICAO recommends 35 hours of flight time, while Part FCL requires 50 hours of flight time and 50 take offs and landings as PIC on balloons.
Chapter 33.2.1.2TKI includes aircraft general knowledge for the given type as well
3.2.1.3.1Experience as a flight navigator in a flight simulator is acceptable as part of the total flight time of 200 hours up to a maximum of 50 hours
3.2.1.4Skill test includes effective use of aircraft systems within their limits on the given type as well
3.2.1.5Class 1 medical certificate is required as defined in Regulation No 1178/2011/EU
3.2.2Privileges of the licence holder is to act as flight navigator on maximum 2 aircraft types only, for which he/she has a type rating, Level 4 language proficiency endorsement is required as defined in EC decision No 1178/2011/EU
3.3.1.2.1TKI includes fundamentals of navigation and operational aspects of meteorology as well
3.3.1.3.1Minimum 200 hours of flight time is required instead of 100 hours
3.3.1.3.2Instead of fuel management the national law mentions fuel flow control
3.3.1.4.1Instead of aeronautical kowledge the national law mentions air traffic knowledge
3.3.1.4.2Not implemented - the national law doesn't mention the use of an FSTD for a skill test
3.3.1.5Class 1 medical certificate is required as defined in Regulation No 1178/2011/EU
3.3.2.1Privileges of the licence holder is to act as flight engineer on maximum 2 aircraft types only, for which he/she has a type rating
3.4Not implemented - the national law doesn't contain regulations for a flight radiotelephone operator licence (there is no such licence), radiotelephony requirements for pilots.
Chapter 44.2.1.4For Basic training Part 66.A.25 only requires that the level of knowledge is demonstrated by examinations. For aircraft type training Approved type rating courses are only required for Group 1 aircraft. For other 2 groups it is optional.
4.2.1.5The skill assessment is not required in case of licence issue based on the Basic knowledge examination only. For Cat. A CS the assessment is performed in Part 145 Organisations. For type examination for Group 2 and 3 aircraft the skill assessment is not mandatory.
4.2.2.2No certifying staff licencing for the release of the components, the entire aircraft can be released by Cat. C CS after the base maintenance.
4.4.1.1There is implicitly no age requirement for the issuance of an air traffic controller licence.
4.4.1.3.1The unit endorsement course duration is not established by the Regulation (EU) 2015/340 does not contain the requirement on the 3 months service.
4.4.1.3.2EU regulation 2015/340 addresses the referenced standard in detailed manner as regards experience and training of on-the-job training instructors
4.5.1The list of ratings is slightly different: a) aerodrome control visual; b) aerodrome control instrument; c) approach control procedural; d) approach control surveillance; e) area control procedural; f) area control surveillance.
4.5.2.2.1The unit endorsement course duration is not established by the Regulatio.EU regulations do not require Surveillance Radar Approach experience/training.
4.5.2.2.2Part-ATCO to Regulation (EU) 2015/340 does not require the application for a rating to be made within six months from the completion of experience. However, the same regulation requires the privileges to be exercised within a time limit that shall not exceed 90 days. The ATCO rule refers to 1 year, when the holder of a student air traffic controller licence has not started exercising the privileges of that licence from the date of its issue or has interrupted exercising those privileges for a period of more than one year. He/she then may only start or continue unit training in that rating after an assessment of his/her previous competence, as to whether he/she continues to satisfy the requirements relevant to that rating, and after satisfying any training requirements resulting from this assessment
4.5.3.1Some ratings are slightly different, although the Regulation covers all of them
4.5.3.3Holders of an instructor endorsement shall be authorized to provide on the job training and supervision at a working position for areas covered by a valid unit endorsement
4.5.3.4Although the concept of ‘invalidation of a rating’ as such does not exist, by meeting these two requirements, the holder of an air traffic controller licence is not allowed to exercise the privileges of a rating after a period of absence of more than 90 days or if the revalidation of the unit endorsement fails due to the non availability of the minimum number of working hours.
4.6.1.2The National Decree determinate only the subjects. These subjects are not detailed therefore not all sub-subjects are included in the trainings.
4.6.1.3.1At least 3 month of experience gained under the supervision of a licenced flight operation officer.
4.6.1.3.2The National Decree does not mention the period when the 3 month experience must be acquired.
4.6.1.4The National Decree does not mention skills to be demonstrated. Knowledge is to be demonstrated.
Chapter 55.1.2No corresponding provisions on the material of the licence in Part 66.
5.1.3For maintenance staff the requirements are different but serve the same purpose, in particular when licence is issued by the MS in the national language and the bearer is working in that MS, the rule allows for such licence not to have any English translation.
Chapter 66.2.3.2Not defined
6.2.4.2For ATCO the requirements are more restrictive: applicants shall be normal trichromates.
6.2.4.3For aircrew regulations state that applicants shall pass the Ishihara test. For ATCO the requirements are more restrictive: pseudoisochromatic plate testing alone is not sufficient. Colour vision should be assessed using means to demonstrate normal trichromacy
6.2.4.4.1Not specified
6.2.5.5Performed only when an instrument rating is to be added to licence
6.3.2.9.1Only required on clinical or epidemiological indication
6.3.2.21.1Fit assessment permitted from start of pregnancy until end 26th week (restricted to multi crew operations).
6.3.3.2.3Ophthalmic reports requirement is dependent on refractive error limits rather that visual acuity limits.
6.4.2.6.2Not implemented
6.4.2.21.1Fit assessment permitted from start of pregnancy until end 26th week.
6.4.3.2.3Not required under EU regulations
6.4.3.5The AMC states that visual fields should be examined but does not define that the fields should be normal.
6.4.3.6The AMC states that binocular function should be examined but does not define that the binocular function should be normal.
6.5.2.6.1Annual ECGs required after age 40
6.5.2.21.1Not implemented
6.5.3.2Applicants with hypermetropia exceeding +5.0 dioptres, myopia exceeding 6 dioptres, an astigmatic component exceeding 3 dioptres or anisometropia exceeding 3 dioptres; shall have a corrected visual acuity of 6/6 or better in each eye.
6.5.3.2.3All initial Medical assessments include a comprehensive eye examination which is repeated periodically depending on the refractive error and the functional performance of the eye.
Annex 2 - Rules of the Air
(10th edition)
Chapter 33.2.2New Provision. Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012, SERA.3210(b), specifies:

“(b) An aircraft that is aware that the manoeuvrability of another aircraft is impaired shall give way to that aircraft.”
3.2.2.4New Provision. Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012, paragraph SERA.3210(c)(3)(i) differs from ICAO Standard in Annex 2, 3.2.2.4 by specifying that:

“(i) Sailplanes overtaking. A sailplane overtaking another sailplane may alter its course to the right or to the left.”
3.2.3.2(b)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012, paragraph SERA.3215(b)(2), specifies (with the addition to ICAO Standard in Annex 2, 3.2.3.2(b) of the text in bold):

“(2) unless stationary and otherwise adequately illuminated, all aircraft on the movement area of an aerodrome shall display lights intended to indicate the extremities of their structure, as far as practicable;”
3.2.5(c) and (d)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012, paragraph SERA.3225 differs from ICAO Standard in Annex 2, 3.2.5(c) and 3.2.5(d) in that it specifies that sub-paragraphs (c) and (d) do not apply to balloons:

“(c) except for balloons, make all turns to the left, when approaching for a landing and after taking off, unless otherwise indicated, or instructed by ATC;
(d) except for balloons, land and take off into the wind unless safety, the runway configuration, or air traffic considerations determine that a different direction is preferable.”
3.3.1.2ICAO Annex 2, 3.3.1.2 is replaced with Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012 SERA.4001(b). The differences between this ICAO Standard and this Union regulation are as follows:
  • - With regards to VFR flights planned to operate across international borders, the Union regulation (SERA.4001(b)(5)) differs from the ICAO Standard in Annex 2, 3.3.1.2(e) with the addition of the text in bold, as follows:

    “any flight across international borders, unless otherwise prescribed by the States concerned.

  • - With regard to VFR and IFR flights planned to operate at night, an additional requirement is inserted to Union regulation SERA.4001(b)(6) as follows:

    “(6) any flight planned to operate at night, if leaving the vicinity of an aerodrome”


This difference is also addressed in Difference under Chapter 4, 4.3., below for VFR.
3.6.1.1Air traffic control clearances shall be supplemented as follows:VFR flights entering Budapest FIR shall obtain entry clearance from Budapest ACC, APP or Budapest FIC as appropriate “at least 10 minutes” prior crossing the boundary.
3.8 and Appendix 2The words “in distress” of Chapter 3 Part 3.8, are not included in Union law, thus enlarging the scope of escort missions to any type of flight requesting such service. Furthermore the provisions contained in Appendix 2 Parts 1.1 to 1.3 inclusive as well as those found in Attachment A, are not contained in Union law.
Chapter 44.1Except when operating as a special VFR flight, VFR flights shall be conducted so that the aircraft is flownin conditions of visibility and distance from clouds equal to or greater than those specified in table on pageENR 1.2-1
4.3New provision. ICAO Annex 2, 4.3, is replaced with Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012 SERA.5005(c). The difference is that Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012 adds requirements under which VFR flights at night may be permitted, as follows:

“(c) When so prescribed by the competent authority, VFR flights at night may be permitted under the following conditions:
  • (1) if leaving the vicinity of an aerodrome, a flight plan shall be submitted;
  • (2) flights shall establish and maintain two-way radio communication on the appropriate ATS communication channel, when available;
  • (3) the VMC visibility and distance from cloud minima as specified in Table S5-1 shall apply except that:
    • (i) the ceiling shall not be less than 450 m (1500 ft);
    • (ii) except as specified in (c)(4), the reduced flight visibility provisions specified in Table S5-1(a) and (b) shall not apply;
    • (iii) in airspace classes B, C, D, E, F and G, at and below 900 m (3000 ft) above MSL or 300 m (1000 ft) above terrain, whichever is the higher, the pilot shall maintain continuous sight of the surface;
    • (iv) for helicopters in airspace classes F and G, flight visibility shall not be less than 3 km, provided that the pilot maintains continuous sight of the surface and if manoeuvred at a speed that will give adequate opportunity to observe other traffic or obstacles in time to avoid collision; and
    • (v) for mountainous terrain, higher VMC visibility and distance from cloud minima may be prescribed.
  • (4) ceiling, visibility and distance from cloud minima lower than those specified 4.3(c) above may be permitted for helicopters in special cases, such as medical flights, search and rescue operations and fire-fighting.
  • (5) except when necessary for take-off or landing, or except when specifically authorised by the competent authority, a VFR flight at night shall be flown at a level which is not below the minimum flight altitude established by the State whose territory is overflown, or, where no such minimum flight altitude has been established:
    • (i) over high terrain or in mountainous areas, at a level which is at least 600 m (2000 ft) above the highest obstacle located within 8 km of the estimated position of the aircraft;
    • (ii) elsewhere than as specified in (i), at a level which is at least 300 m (1000 ft) above the highest obstacle located within 8 km of the estimated position of the aircraft.”
4.6ICAO Annex 2, 4.6, is replaced with Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012 SERA.5005, introducing the obstacle clearance criteria in (f), as follows:
“(f) Except when necessary for take-off or landing, or except by permission from the competent authority, a VFR flight shall not be flown:
  • (1) over the congested areas of cities, towns or settlements or over an open-air assembly of persons at a height less than 300 m (1000 ft) above the highest obstacle within a radius of 600 m from the aircraft;
  • (2) elsewhere than as specified in (1), at a height less than 150 m (500 ft) above the ground or water, or 150 m (500 ft) above the highest obstacle within a radius of 150 m (500 ft) from the aircraft.
Annex 3 - Meteorological Service
for International Air Navigation
(18th edition)
Chapter 55.5New provision. Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012, paragraph SERA.12005, specifies:

(b) Competent authorities shall prescribe as necessary other conditions which shall be reported by all aircraft when encountered or observed.
Annex 4 - Aeronautical Charts
(11th edition)
NIL
Annex 5 - Units of Measurement to be Used in Air and Ground Operations (5th edition)NIL
Annex 6 - Operation of Aircraft
Part I - (9th edition)
Part II - (8th edition)
Part III - (7th edition)
NIL
Annex 7 - Aircraft Nationality and Registration Marks (6th edition)NIL
Annex 8 - Airworthiness of Aircraft (11th edition)NIL
Annex 9 - Facilitation
(13th edition)
NIL2.7/ Cargo manifest is required 2.8 /Data of gross weight is required 2.13/ Filling of load-sheet is required 2.14/ Use of standard baggage weights is not permitted 2.16/ Filling of load-sheet is required 2.18/ Translation of Spanish language documents is required 3.8/ The visa charge is 1600 HUF which shall be paid in convertible currency according to the daily rate of exchange of the Hungarian National Bank. 3.8.2/ Entrance visas are granted with a maximum validity of six month. Visas obtained at the airport are granted with a maximum validity of one month. 3.20/ To comply with formalities is duty of the passenger or it's representative. 3.23/ Passports and according to agreements visas required for crew members outside of transit area. 3.29/ Presentation of baggage in case of overweight is required. 4.8/ Presentation of such documents is required 4.12/ Inspection of cargo and unaccompanied baggage is being carried out. 4.22/ Private gift packages and trade sample are not exempt from governmental clearance documents. 4.28/ Each item of imported cargo is being examined. 5.2, 5.4/ Presentation of passport is required. 5.11, 5.12, 5.13/ Neither free airports nor free zones have been established. 6.31.1/ No storage facilities are provided.
Annex 10 - Aeronautical Telecommunications
Volume I - (6th edition)
Volume II - (6th edition)
Volume III - (2nd edition)
Volume IV - (5th edition)
Volume V - (3rd edition)
NIL
Annex 11 - Air Traffic Services
(13th edition)
Chapter 22.6.1Exemption possibility. Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012 paragraph SERA.6001 allows aircraft to exceed the 250 knot speed limit where approved by the competent authority for aircraft types, which for technical or safety reasons, cannot maintain this speed.
2.26.5Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012 SERA.3401(d)(1) differs from ICAO Annex 11, standard 2.25.5 by stating that

“Time checks shall be given at least to the nearest minute”
Chapter 33.3.4New provision. Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012, paragraph SERA.8005(b), specifies:

“(b) Clearances issued by air traffic control units shall provide separation:
(1) between all flights in airspace Classes A and B;
(2) between IFR flights in airspace Classes C, D and E;
(3) between IFR flights and VFR flights in airspace Class C;
(4) between IFR flights and special VFR flights;
(5) between special VFR flights unless otherwise prescribed by the competent authority;
except that, when requested by the pilot of an aircraft and agreed by the pilot of the other aircraft and if so prescribed by the competent authority for the cases listed under (b) above in airspace Classes D and E, a flight may be cleared subject to maintaining own separation in respect of a specific portion of the flight below 3050 m (10000 ft) during climb or descent, during day in visual meteorological conditions.
3.7.3.1Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012, paragraph SERA.8015, specifies (with the addition to ICAO Standard in Annex 11, 3.7.3.1 of the text in bold):

“(e) Read-back of clearances and safety-related information
  • (1) The flight crew shall read back to the air traffic controller safety-related parts of ATC clearances and instructions which are transmitted by voice. The following items shall always be read back:
    • (i) ATC route clearances;
    • (ii) clearances and instructions to enter, land on, take off from, hold short of, cross, taxi and backtrack on any runway; and
    • (iii) runway-in-use, altimeter settings, SSR codes, newly assigned communication channels, level instructions, heading and speed instructions; and
    • (iv) transition levels, whether issued by the controller or contained in ATIS broadcasts.”

Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012, paragraph SERA.8015(e)(2), specifies (with the addition to ICAO Standard in Annex 11, 3.7.3.1.1 of the text in bold):

“(2) Other clearances or instructions, including conditional clearances and taxi instructions, shall be read back or acknowledged in a manner to clearly indicate that they have been understood and will be complied with.”
3.7.3.1.1(EU) No 923/2012, paragraph SERA.8015(e) (2)  Other clearances or instructions, including conditional clearances and taxi instructions, shall be read back or acknowledged in a manner to clearly indicate that they have been understood and will be complied with.
New provision. Implementing Regulation (EU) No 923/2012, paragraph SERA.5010, specifies:

SERA.5010 Special VFR in control zones

Special VFR flights may be authorised to operate within a control zone, subject to an ATC clearance. Except when permitted by the competent authority for helicopters in special cases such as medical flights, search and rescue operations and fire-fighting, the following additional conditions shall be applied:
  • (a) by the pilot:
    • (1) clear of cloud and with the surface in sight;
    • (2) the flight visibility is not less than 1500 m or, for helicopters, not less than 800 m;
    • (3) at speed of 140 kts IAS or less to give adequate opportunity to observe other traffic and any obstacles in time to avoid a collision; and
  • (b) by ATC:
    • (1) during day only, unless otherwise permitted by the competent authority;
    • (2) the ground visibility is not less than 1500 m or, for helicopters, not less than 800 m;
    • (3) the ceiling is not less than 180 m (600 ft).
Annex 12 - Search and Rescue
(8th edition)
NIL
Annex 13 - Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation
(10th edition)
NIL
Annex 14 - Aerodromes
Volume I - (6th edition)
Volume II - (4th edition)
Chapter 11.2.1Responsibilities are clearly addressed throughout the rules. It was found that this provision could not be transposed as such.
1.2.3The specifications of Chapter U of the CS, transpose paragraphs 2.1.2 and 2.3.2 of Appendix 1 of Annex 14 as guidance material. To be reviewed under RMT.0591; CS Issue 5;
1.3.2The specification has not yet been transposed.
1.3.3The specification has not yet been transposed.
1.3.3.2The specification has not yet been transposed.
1.4.1The 2018/1139/EU reg. has a different applicability scope.
1.4.2The 2018/1139/EU reg. has a different applicability scope.
Chapter 22.1.2The specification has not yet been transposed.
2.1.3The specification has not yet been transposed
2.1.4The specification has not yet been transposed
2.2.2The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.2.3The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.3.1The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.3.2The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.3.3The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.4.1The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.4.2The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.5.1The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.5.2The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.5.3The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.5.4The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.6.2The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.6.3The specification has been transposed as guidance material
2.6.4The specification has been transposed as guidance material
2.6.5The specification has been transposed as guidance material
2.6.6The specification has been transposed as guidance material
2.6.7The specification has been transposed as guidance material
2.6.8The specification has been transposed as guidance material
2.7.1The specification has been transposed as guidance material
2.7.2The specification has been transposed as guidance material
2.7.3The specification has been transposed as guidance material
2.9.2The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.9.5The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.9.6The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.9.7The specification has not been transposed.
2.9.8The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.9.9The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.9.10The specification has not been transposed.
2.10.1The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.10.2The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.11.1The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.11.2The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.11.3The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.11.4The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
2.12The specification has been partially transposed. The transposed specification is in Guidance Material.
Chapter 33.1.2The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
3.1.3.1The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
3.1.4.1The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
3.1.6The specification has been partially transposed. The transposed specification is in Guidance Material.
3.1.7.1The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
3.1.8.1The specification has not yet been transposed.
3.1.9.1The specification has been partially transposed as Guidance Material.
3.1.12Part of the specification related to the minimum distance for independent parallel approaches has not been transposed, or does not reflect the intent of the specification.
3.1.17The note regarding the case of intersecting runways where additional criteria are to be used for ensuring the necessary unobstructed line of sight has not been transposed.
3.1.23The minimum friction level has not been defined.
3.1.24The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
3.2.1The relevant specification foresees that a runway shoulder needs to be provided only if the OMGWS is between 9m up to but not including 15m.
3.3.1The provision of the runway turn pad is conditional due to the inclusion of the words "if required" in the CS.
3.3.2The provision of the runway turn pad is conditional due to the inclusion of the words "if required" in the CS.
3.3.12The case of the "most demanding" aircraft is considered in the CS.
3.4.7The certification specifications contains higher values for certain runway types.
3.4.12The specification has been transposed as guidance material, which does not address the necessary areas.
3.5.12The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
3.6.3The current certification specification contains a higher value for certain types of runways.
3.6.5The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
3.8.1The provision of radio altimeter operating area is conditional for CAT I runways.
3.8.4The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
3.9.1The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
3.9.2The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
3.9.7The specification has been partially transposed as Guidance Material.
3.9.9.1Paragraph (c) of the CS gives the possibility for different slopes, under given conditions.
3.9.12The specification provides for a "suitable" strength.
3.12.1The CS does not foresee when holding bays are to provided.
3.12.6The current certification specification does not clarify the intent of the specification with respect to the inner transitional surface.
3.12.8The provision has been transposed as GM.
3.13.2The provision has been transposed as GM.
3.13.6The specification contains another 2 cases where deviation from the clearance distances may be applied. The relevant GM foresees reduction of the clearances for code letter C aircraft stands which is not foreseen in the CS.
3.14.2The specification has been partially transposed as Guidance Material.
3.15.2Part of the specification related to the drainage arrangements has not been transposed.
3.15.4The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material
3.15.6The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material
3.15.7The part of the specification regarding maximum longitudinal slopes and transverse slopes has not been transposed.
3.15.11The specification has not been transposed.
Chapter 44.2.14The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
4.2.16For code F aeroplanes, the width of the inner approach surface and the length of the inner edge of the balked landing surface are increased to 140m, irrespective of the type of avionics (Table J-1).
4.2.23The CS addresses also the case of runways with clearways.
4.2.24The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material
4.2.26The specification has been transposed as guidance material, which additionally does not foresee the limitation of new objects.
4.3.1The provision does not foresee the consultation with the "appropriate authority", neither refers to an aeronautical study/safety assessment.
Chapter 55.1.1.4The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.1.3.2Paragraph (c) has not yet been transposed, and part of the specification has been transposed as guidance material.
5.1.4.1The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.1.4.2The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.1.4.3The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.2.1.7The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.2.4.10The notes of the specification have not yet been transposed.
5.2.8.3Taxiway centre lines are meant to be provided.
5.2.8.4Paragraph (a) of the CS does not ensure that an enhanced taxiway centreline is provided when necessary.
5.2.10.5The specification has not yet been transposed.
5.2.10.7The specification has not yet been transposed.
5.2.13.2The specification has not yet been transposed.
5.2.13.5The part of the specification regarding the case that it is difficult to identify which stand marking to follow, has not been transposed.
5.2.13.10The CS requires the designation of the appropriate aircraft types.
5.2.16.1The specification has been transposed in such a way that the non-installation of the mandatory instruction marking is not subject to the impracticability to do so.
5.2.16.5The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.2.17.2The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material
5.2.17.3The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material
5.2.17.4The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material
5.2.17.5The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material
5.2.17.8The height of the characters conforms to that of the mandatory instruction signs.
5.3.3.3The specification has been adopted so that at least 2 conditions (instead of 1) should exist for the aerodrome beacon to be provided.
5.3.3.6The part of the specification related to the coloured flashes of the beacons has not been transposed.
5.3.5.2The CS are limited only to the PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.3The CS are limited only to the PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.6The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.3.5.7The CS are limited only to PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.8The CS are limited only to PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.9The CS are limited only to PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.10The CS are limited only to PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.11The CS are limited only to PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.12The CS are limited only to PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.13The CS are limited only to PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.14The CS are limited only to PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.15The CS are limited only to PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.16The CS are limited only to PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.17The CS are limited only to PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.18The CS are limited only to PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.19The CS are limited only to PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.20The CS are limited only to PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.21The CS are limited only to PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.22The CS are limited only to PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.23The CS are limited only to PAPI-APAPI systems thus they are considered more demanding.
5.3.5.44The CS foresees one more case where an object or an extension to an existing object may penetrate the obstacle protection surface.
5.3.5.45The CS does not foresee the removal of existing objects as prescribed in the specification.
5.3.7.6The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.3.8.1The specification has been transposed in a way that does not ensure its implementation.
5.3.12.2The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.3.12.4The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.3.15.1The specification has been transposed as guidance material, and the CS does not ensure the availability of the system.
5.3.15.2The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.3.17.13Paragraph (a) of the specification has not been transposed.
5.3.19.2The specification foresees that the lights may not be provided under certain conditions.
5.3.20.1A stop bar is to be provided when the runway is intended to be used with an RVR less than 550m.
5.3.20.4The part of the specification with regard to the location of additional lights has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.3.20.6The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.3.20.8The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.3.22.1Paragraph (a) of the CS describes only the purpose of the lights, while paragraph (b) of the CS does not ensure the provision of the lights.
5.3.23.5The current certification specifications do not address this provision.
5.3.23.6The current certification specifications do not address this provision.
5.3.23.7The current certification specifications do not address this provision.
5.3.23.8The current certification specifications do not address this provision.
5.3.23.11The current certification specifications do not address this provision.
5.3.24.1The provision of floodlighting on de-icing/anti-icing facilities is conditional, without established criteria. In addition, Certain apron types are excluded.
5.3.25.10The CS foresees that such alignment is preferable.
5.3.25.15The CS foresees that such usability is preferable.
5.3.28.1A road-holding position light is to be provided when the runway is to be used with RVR below 550m
5.3.29.4The current certification specifications do not address this provision.
5.3.29.5The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.3.29.7The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.3.29.8The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.4.3.5The provision of intersection take off signs is not conditional on "operational need".
5.4.3.24The specification does not ensure the installation of the opposite side of the taxiway, and it has been partially transposed as Guidance Material.
5.4.3.35The current certification specification does not fully address this provision.
5.4.3.37The current certification specification does not fully address this provision.
5.4.5.1The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.4.5.2The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.4.5.3The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.4.5.4The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.4.5.5The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
5.5.4.3The specification has not yet been transposed.
Chapter 66.1.1.4Paragraph (d)(3) of the CS foresees that a medium intensity type A light may also be used.
6.1.1.5Paragraph (e)(2) of the CS foresees that a medium intensity type A light may also be used.
6.1.1.6Paragraph (d)(3) of the CS foresees that a medium intensity type A light may also be used.
6.1.1.7Paragraph (f)(3) of the CS foresees that a medium intensity type A light may also be used.
6.1.1.8The CS foresees the exemption from marking and lighting.
6.1.1.9The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
6.1.1.10The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
6.1.2.2The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
6.1.2.3The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
6.1.2.2.1The part of the specification regarding the colour has been transposed as Guidance Material.
6.2.3.2The last part of the specification regarding the colour has been transposed as Guidance Material.
6.2.3.18The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
6.2.3.23The GM foresees the possibility to also use low intensity lights
6.2.3.30The part of the specification regarding the colour has been partially transposed as Guidance Material.
6.2.5.11The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
Chapter 77.2.2The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
Chapter 88.1.9The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
8.1.10Essential security lighting and essential equipment and facilities for the aerodrome responding emergency services, are not covered by the CS.
8.1.11The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
Chapter 99.1.3The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
9.1.4The specification has not yet been transposed.
9.1.5The AMC requires more detailed and precise information with regard to points b) and e) of the ICAO specification.
9.1.6The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
9.1.7The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material, which additionally allows the possibility for a mobile command post not to be provided.
9.1.8The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
9.1.9The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
9.1.10The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
9.1.11The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material, which additionally allows the possibility for communication systems not to be provided.
9.1.13The AMC does not foresee the possibility of modular tests in the first year and a full emergency exercise at intervals not exceeding 3 years.
9.1.15The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
9.2.2The AMC does not foresee the provision of specialist fire-fighting equipment appropriate to the hazard and risk.
9.2.4The AMC uses the principles contained in 9.2.5 and 9.2.6 for establishing the level of protection for an aerodrome; however paragraph (c ) of the AMC allows the reduction of the required level of protection.
9.2.16The wording of the AMC does not ensure that supplementary water supplies are to be provided.
9.2.21The specification has not yet been transposed.
9.2.29The AMC does not include a certain response time to be achieved. In addition, the notes regarding the response time have not been fully transposed.
9.2.31The AMC foresees the arrival of vehicles, other from the 1st responding vehicle, by taking into account the time that this 1st vehicle should respond.
9.2.32The AMC foresees the arrival of vehicles, other from the 1st responding vehicle, by taking into account the time that this 1st vehicle should respond
9.2.34The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
9.2.35The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
9.2.36The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
9.2.45The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
9.3.1The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
9.3.2The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
9.4.4The specification has not been fully transposed.
9.5.1The specification has been transposed.
9.5.2The specification has been transposed.
9.5.3The specification has been transposed.
9.5.4The specification has been transposed.
9.5.5The specification has been transposed.
9.5.6The specification has been transposed.
9.5.7The specification has been transposed.
9.6.1The specification has been transposed.
9.6.2The specification has been transposed.
9.7.1The specification has been transposed.
9.7.2The specification has been transposed.
9.7.3The specification has been transposed.
9.7.4The part of the specification regarding compliance of the drivers with the instructions given has not yet been transposed.
9.7.5The specification has been transposed.
9.8.3The specification has been transposed.
9.8.7The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
9.8.8The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
9.9.4In addition to the cases foreseen in the relevant specification, the CS allows the presence of equipment/ installations also after a safety assessment regarding safety and regularity.
9.9.5The current certification specification is more demanding with regard to the installation of objects for certain runway types.
9.10.4The CS defines the distance with relation to runway and taxiway centreline, as opposed to the movement area and other facilities of the aerodrome.
9.10.5The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
9.11.1The specification has not yet been transposed.
Chapter 1010.1.2The specification has been transposed as Guidance Material.
10.2.3The minimum friction level has not been defined. Only guidance material has been provided.
10.2.4The specification has not been transposed.
10.2.7The specification has been partially transposed as Guidance Material with regard to the definition of the minimum friction level, which has not been defined.
10.2.8The specification has been transposed as guidance material.
10.2.10The specification has not yet been transposed.
10.3.5The specification has not yet been transposed.
10.4.2The specification has not yet been transposed.
10.4.3The specification has not yet been transposed.
10.4.5The specification has not yet been transposed.
10.5.1Notes 2 and 3 have not yet been transposed.
10.5.3The specification has not yet been transposed.
10.5.4The specification has not yet been transposed.
10.5.5The specification has not yet been transposed.
10.5.6The specification has not yet been transposed.
10.5.8The CS applies for taxiway operations under 550m RVR
10.5.9The CS applies for taxiway operations under 550m RVR
10.5.13The specification has not yet been transposed.
Annex 15 - Aeronautical Information Services
(14th edition)
NIL
Annex 16 - Environmental Protection
Volume I - (7th edition)
Volume II - (3rd edition)
NIL
Annex 17 - Security (9th edition)NIL
Annex 18 - The Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air
(4th edition)
Chapter 11.03Crew member’ means a person assigned by an operator to perform duties on board an aircraft.' The definition on Reg. (EU) 965/2012 doesn’t restrict it to the flight duty period.    
Chapter 22.3Annex 18 and the Technical Instructions are applicable through Reg.(EU) 965/2012 to domestic operations. The national authority shall regulate for what is not covered by the rules.    
2.5.1EU Member States share the implementation.
Chapter 44.2Some requirements (i.e. shippers) are not covered under the scope of EU Rules and are implemented by the national authorities.
Chapter 99.4The regulation cover just operators.
9.6.1The scope of the information to be notified is specified in the AMC.
9.6.2The scope of the information to be notified is specified in the AMC.
Chapter 1212.1IR (EU) 2015/1018 laying down a list classifying occurrences in civil aviation to be mandatorily reported according to (EU) No 376/2014 is not fully in line with what is stated in the Technical Instructions. Detailed procedures shall be developed by EU MS.
Annex 19 - Safety Management
(1st edition)
Chapter 11.0.3Industry codes of practice: No definition Operational personnel; REMARKS: Different in characters but no difference.The term is present and recognised in EU rules even if there is no definition. Safety: No definition
Chapter 33.3.2.1(S)MS not yet implemented for design, manufacture and maintenance organisations in Reg. (EU) 748/2012 and in Annex II to Reg. (EU) 1321/2014).
3.3.2.3REMARKS: Reg. (EU) 965/2012 requires all noncommercial operators of complex motor powered aircraft to implement the management system requirements (applicable since 25 August 2016), cf. Art. 1 point (9) of Regulation (EU) 800/2013).
3.3.2.4REMARKS: Reg. (EU) 965/2012 requires all noncommercial operators of complex motor powered aircraft to implement the management system requirements (applicable since 25 August 2016), cf. Art. 1 point (9) of Regulation (EU) 800/2013).
3.4.1.2Recommendation is addressed in the different regulations, except for initial and continuing airworthiness (Reg. (EU) 748/2012 and Annex II of Reg. (EU) 1321/2014).
3.4.1.3Recommendation is addressed in the different regulations, except for initial and continuing airworthiness (Reg. (EU) 748/2012 and Annex II of Reg. (EU) 1321/2014).
Chapter 44.1.1This is addressed in the different regulations, except for initial and continuing airworthiness (Reg. (EU) 748/2012 and Annex II of Reg. (EU) 1321/2014).
4.1.2(S)MS not yet implemented for design, manufacture and maintenance organisations in Reg. (EU) 748/2012 and in Annex II to Reg. (EU) 1321/2014 (see NPA 2019-05)
4.1.5Not yet addressed in Annex II to Regulation (EU) 1321/2014 (Part-145).
4.1.6Not yet addressed in Regulation (EU) 748/2012 (Part-21).
4.1.7Not yet addressed in Regulation (EU) 748/2012 4.1.7 (Part-21).
4.2SMS must be acceptable to the State of Operator (SoO), not the State of Registry (SoR). However this is not a difference as in the EU the SoO principle prevails and the EASA standard is high.
DOC 4444 - ATM/501 - PROCEDURES FOR AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES - AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
Chapter 1010.1.4.1.1

A unit providing approach control service shall retain control of arriving aircraft until such aircraft have been cleared to the aerodrome control tower and are in communication with the aerodrome control tower. Not more than one arrival shall be cleared to a unit providing aerodrome control service during IMC, except when the aerodrome control service is able to monitor the separation between arriving aircraft - transferred for control to it - on the final approach path with an electronic device approved by the appropriate ATS authority for this purpose.

Chapter 88.6.9.1

Owing to the fact that the active area of adverse weather may not show on ATS surveillance system the following procedure should be applied:

When a controlled aircraft experiencing adverse weather which is likely to force the pilot to initiate action to circumnavigate the adverse weather area beyond the prescribed track keeping accuracy (+ 5 NM), it should be reported in sufficient time to permit ATC to co-ordinate with neighbouring unit responsible for control of traffic in the area concerned.

The pilot’s intention for avoiding action should be reported as soon as possible prior to the point from which the aircraft is expected to deviate from the assigned flight path, stating the required direction of turn and estimated distance from the prescribed track.

Appendix 2

ITEM 15: ROUTE

(b) CRUISING LEVEL

For VFR flight planning to operate in uncontrolled airspace cruising level/altitude shall also be indicated.

(5) CRUISE CLIMB
For segment of route cruise climb must not be indicated in Budapest FIR.
VFR flights shall be planned to enter/exit Budapest FIR via designated ATS entry/exit points only.
Comission Regulation (EU) 73/2010 (ADQ)
Data not fully compliant with data quality requirements of Commission Regulation (EU) 73/2010 (ADQ).
Several data are not compliant with the given regulation - details can be accessed online via the website of AIS: